I noticed that your community was not yet using Discussions, our Forum feature replacement we developed for our communities last year. We no longer support Special:Forums and will be sun-setting that feature soon. In the meantime, we have switched all new communities to Discussions and are manually enabling it on already established communities who are willing to make the change now.
Discussions is a feature that users can use to post questions, thoughts, images, links and even videos. They can upvote posts and even share them on social media. Users can edit their posts for the first 24 hours, but Admins and Moderators can edit posts anytime. Users can report posts they feel do not comply with our guidelines, or that of the community. Admins and Moderators can remove them. We give you the tools you need. Since the introduction of Discussions, we have seen a pretty big increase in community interaction. You can find more information on Discussions here.
As part of the process, we can import your current Forums into Discussions, but since this communities forum is inactive and has been for a time, you may want us to just close it instead. The choice is yours.
Let me know if your community would like to have Discussions enabled and if you would want the forums imported. I would be happy to take care of it for you. If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know.
Hey there, I'm new to this wikia here. I've only returned to The Division after a year and decided to contribute what I can here.
I've noticed some of the Survival Guidebook articles content seems to be inaccurate and I've started correcting some of them based on info from the game. I'm not sure what the list was like in the past and whether there is any changes, but I believe there isnt a Page 6 in the game(The content inside is actually for Page 5), so can I propose that the Page 6 article be deleted?
The top part of the text on page 6 of the book you posted seems to be added into page 5 in the game. It seems there's a mismatch of the content between the book and game itself. So, what do would you propose would be the better solution for this? Should we just follow the book itself or the game?
Check out your Admin Dashboard, which can by found by clicking "Admin" on the bottom toolbar -- it has links to all your new tools. Please let me know if you have any questions, and good luck with your new (old) wiki!
So, since both of us are pretty active, I think it's safe to ask here, for additional input from the community, since we're gonna be adopting the Wiki, we should probably, at the very least, update the patch area (which hasn't been changed since 1.1 xD). Just checking to make sure you agree.
I've been farming the caduceus for almost a week now today is the 5th day that I've killed all world bosses and i have over 674 run into Amherst's apartment still no weapon I've gotten all other named guns but this one i play on ps4 on world tier 5
so u tell me and ive read the wiki and look for other ways to find this weapon , how do i get this caduceus >_>
The reason I undid the translation is because it is on the English version of the wikia. If we want to translate it to a different language on this wikia, we need to use the Interlanguage Link .
Besides, there is already a version of the translated wikia here . This language version has not been touched August. The weapons page of it is here. At the bottom of the weapons page, I've added the link to the espanol section for you as well. You can either make the edits on that language section, or do it on your own wikia.
It's no problem with the editing. For future reference, use the other character pages such as Aaron Keener. It contains the infobox coding, so you can use that as a template.
Also I would like to see people place edit summaries. You can see the blue highlighted section saying "Grammer edits". You can access this page going pressing the edit button on the article page. This way, you can still inform us on what you did without using the comments section.
I'm not saying you should do this, but it would our work here a little more simple and clear.